|
Title: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: Kimberly AJ on April 12, 2007, 06:24AM I think I have a feeling that Chloe is not "debunked" for any other member. Pals, do you think she is "debunked" or not? Please, tell me.
Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: Anderpaw on April 12, 2007, 06:44AM Not sure where that came from, but I don't see Chloe being debunked by anyone for anything.
Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: fireyred09 on April 12, 2007, 07:15AM Nope! I don't think she's being debunked by anyone!
Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: jsharp on April 12, 2007, 07:51AM Hmmm.... I don't think anyone will disprove her existence or abilities. How this effects the other gals, you've got me there.
Now, if you mean she'll lose her bunk on the bus if they add anymore members, I'd doubt that too. She's one of the originals. ;D Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: Kimberly AJ on April 12, 2007, 08:38AM Ah, heh, heh, heh. :D Now, that's too typical for now. ;D
Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: m.k.c. on April 12, 2007, 09:55AM What do you mean by "de-bunked?"
Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: Kimberly AJ on April 12, 2007, 10:14AM I mean that she is not off of the bunk. ;D :D
Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: Matt on April 12, 2007, 11:37AM she means "debunked" as in being replaced. Is that right?
Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: Kimberly AJ on April 12, 2007, 01:58PM Sorry about that. I was a little confused. ;)
Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: m.k.c. on April 12, 2007, 09:55PM Well if you mean will she be replaced I doubt it. I hope not anyway. Unless she lives willingly. Then I can see them bringing someone in.
Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: Elizabeth on April 13, 2007, 12:00AM Chloe leaving Celtic Woman is not going to be acceptable with ANY of the fans, so she'd better get nice and comfy right where she is. :D In fact, NONE of the five originals can leave. Period. End of story. 8)
Btw, great to see KAJ and Matt found their way to the new forum! Welcome back!! Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: CWFan2 on April 13, 2007, 03:24AM What's all this chatter about Chloe "debunked" Huh? No real, true CELTIC WOMAN fan would even consider the possibility of Chloe not being there! We would not tolerate that. Chloe IS a CELTIC WOMAN and here to stay a CELTIC WOMAN. I think most would agree, it would not be the same without her. She has found her 'place', her 'home' and she truly belongs where she is. She too is a Angel, one of the six lovely, talented Angels of CELTIC WOMAN! I will not even entertain the thought of Chloe not being there!
Peace to all ... Bill Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: m.k.c. on April 13, 2007, 09:44AM I don't want her to leave the group at all. And the group would definitely change if she left. However she's young enough that she may want to for any variety of reasons. That was my point. I'd rather she didn't obviously, but if she wanted to I'd be behind her 100%
Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: Cash on April 13, 2007, 10:23AM No real, true CELTIC WOMAN fan would even consider the possibility of Chloe not being there! We would not tolerate that. Chloe IS a CELTIC WOMAN and here to stay a CELTIC WOMAN. I will not even entertain the thought of Chloe not being there! Anything can happen in life. We never know what will happen tomorrow or what path we might take. What if Donald Trump offers her $50 million a year to perform at one of his places? What if she wants kids? It is always prudent to have contingency plans in mind. Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: Kimberly AJ on April 13, 2007, 11:51AM Which I think it is so obvious. VERY obvious. :P
Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: Meldy on April 13, 2007, 03:57PM I agree, Chloe is part of Celtic Woman, she IS Celtic Woman. Chloe is a significant, much more than a significant member of this wonderful group.
Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: CWFan2 on April 13, 2007, 04:58PM Before this gets out of hand or taken completely out of context, Chloe is not going anywhere. There's just a slight bit of confusion in this thread, is all. We can all relax, knowing that Chloe is truly a CELTIC WOMAN.
Peace to all ... Bill Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: Meldy on April 13, 2007, 05:01PM ;)
Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: m.k.c. on April 13, 2007, 09:59PM Before this gets out of hand or taken completely out of context, Chloe is not going anywhere. There's just a slight bit of confusion in this thread, is all. We can all relax, knowing that Chloe is truly a CELTIC WOMAN. Peace to all ... Bill Good call Bill. Wouldn't want anyone to panic :) Title: Re: Don't "debunk" Chloe for who? Post by: OldFatGuy on April 14, 2007, 06:53AM Okay, gang, I think we've come to the conclusion that Chloe is not being "debunked" or leaving CW. Kimberley meant no disrespect, nor did she expect to unleash a storm of controversy. In fact, KAJ might just be Chloe's biggest fan, and she's been a delightful member through several incarnations of this forum.
I think we've ended this discussion on a positive note, so I'm respectfully closing this thread. Rich |