|
Title: Favorable review, unfavorable journalism Post by: littlecubspirit on April 27, 2013, 10:36PM http://seviercountynews.com/mike-williams/celtic-woman-brings-inspiring-and-entertaining-show-harrahs/31178 (http://seviercountynews.com/mike-williams/celtic-woman-brings-inspiring-and-entertaining-show-harrahs/31178)
The author of the above article needs to familiarize himself with spellcheck and make sure he gets song names/song credits correct. But overall a very favorable review for our girls. Rather Mairead centric, and with no mention of Chloe, Lil Lambe or Susan...hmmm... a bit biased perhaps? He certainly wouldn't be the first person our pixie has entranced but... grr (rant over) (Edit: And NO mention of David Downes...double grr) Title: Re: Favorable review, unfavorable journalism Post by: Emer Dreamer on April 27, 2013, 10:37PM Agreed on all counts .... 8)
Title: Re: Favorable review, unfavorable journalism Post by: Kevin R.I. on April 28, 2013, 06:11AM they`re an "all girl BAND ?" .......since when? he probably calls them "Seltic Women" and eats soup with a knife ::)
Title: Re: Favorable review, unfavorable journalism Post by: mattycakes on April 28, 2013, 07:36AM I know this review is favorable to the girls, but dear God is it ever awful. This looks like a paper that a high school senior typed up the morning it was due! Disgraceful! How does this man even have a journalism degree?
Title: Re: Favorable review, unfavorable journalism Post by: littlecubspirit on April 28, 2013, 08:05AM I know this review is favorable to the girls, but dear God is it ever awful. This looks like a paper that a high school senior typed up the morning it was due! Disgraceful! How does this man even have a journalism degree? Agreed! One HUNDRED percent. I found it and facepalmed Title: Re: Favorable review, unfavorable journalism Post by: edtom on April 28, 2013, 10:48AM Not exactly inspired journalism, but I've seen worse-MUCH worse.
Title: Re: Favorable review, unfavorable journalism Post by: Maloney on April 28, 2013, 12:54PM as they say....
Any publicity is...... Title: Re: Favorable review, unfavorable journalism Post by: mattycakes on April 29, 2013, 07:45AM To be brutally honest, I'd rather see a bad review. Because then at least the journalist is articulate enough to say why he/she think its bad and can successfully and validly argue a point to which we can counter-argue.
|